Tuesday, June 11, 2019

Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke Versus Marvin Gayes Case Essay - 1

Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke Versus Marvin Gayes Case - Essay ExampleMarvins children said that the money they demanded was what they believed their beget would have been given had he signed his song with the label. Robin and Williams argued that the family only had a right to the sheet music and not the sound. In fact, earlier they had sued Marvins estates in order to stop them from going ahead with their copyright infringement case. However, they both did not claim to have written this song together scarcely independently. They held on to their innocence and said they were not through with the case yet. An additional $8000 is also to be added to the amount given to Marvin Gayes estate. This case has brought down Williams disposition as a songwriter as he was ordered to pay $1.6 million while Robin $1.7 million (Grow).Copyright infringement occurs when anybody breaches the restricted rights of some other persons material whether words, sound or pictures. This rule is seen as theft as the violator uses a copyrighted material without the owners authorization (Campbell, Cotter & Center for International Legal Studies, 2).Even though the deuce songs do not have the same sound, the words in the two songs are similar and this constitutes a breach. The two musicians have violated Marvin Gayes song even though they argue that the sheet music is what Gaye copyrighted.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.